Blog Layout

Last Valentine's I Gave You My Heart....

Lucy Ryan • Feb 13, 2020

The amazing story of Lucy Ryan's heart transplant - and her work to make organ donation 'opt out' from Spring 2020

Today is Valentines Day and it got me thinking all about hearts of all kinds…  Like any love story it began dramatically…

The doctors don’t think I was a fan of being born and had a suspected heart attack. I was born in Norwich, but at a few hours old had to be helicoptered to Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) in London. At GOSH it was discovered I had a leaky valve in my heart. The doctors were brilliant and got me to the age of two years-old before I needed any open-heart surgery. I had a valve repair in October 1992, but unfortunately needed another valve replacing in January 1993.  I did not recover at all well from this second heart break.  

Therefore it was decided my only chance of survival was a new heart - a heart transplant! This was still pretty radical in the nineties and practically unheard of in paediatric patients. In 1993 they had only been doing children’s heart transplants for 5 years in the UK, so all they could tell my parents was I might gain five years. It was a big risk as it could’ve ended in rejection, but like any true love story it was worth the risk.

Not long after my Mum got a call from one of the nurses at the hospital checking in to see how we were. She then mentioned that the hospital had a “match” for me and that an ambulance would be with us in twenty minutes. My poor Mum then had to get my Dad to rush back from work and arrange for a friend to take my sister - they left all the doors open with the dogs running around as I got bundled into the ambulance.

Luckily, my donor’s heart was the perfect fit and on the 16th of April 1993 my heart transplant began and finished in the early hours of the 17th April. That wasn’t the end of my incredible surgeon's work as they carried out another heart transplant that night as well. Despite all the odds and possible complications of any Hollywood romcom I recovered miraculously well and was able to begin school as normal 4 year old. 

Now 26 years on I am really living happily ever after. I am very well and able to do anything I wish to in life such as sports, travel and working full time. This is all thanks to my donor and their amazing family. I received my heart from another child. I cannot begin to understand their family's pain at losing a child, but have been told by my donor family that it is a comfort to know their child saved my life. Some light has come out of a very dark time.

But not everyone is so lucky; not everyone gets their perfect match…It was back in 2015 after losing a number of friends who needed a transplant, but didn’t get one in time that I was feeling so helpless that I decided to channel this pain and do something about it. Following extensive research, I decided despite all the fantastic awareness various organ and tissue donation organisations were doing it wasn’t reflected in the number of donors. I discovered that 96% of the UK population would take an organ donation if they needed one, yet only 36% has actually got around to signing up to become an organ donor. I decided something as radical as my heart transplant was in 1993 was needed - like a whole new dating approach.  

Currently in England we choose to donate organs and tissues through an Opt In system where we have to sign up to become an organ donor. But I discovered other countries such as Spain use the Opt Out system where you make the effort to opt out if you don’t want to be a donor, otherwise it is assumed you were in favour. As with the Opt In system your next of kin will be consulted.

As a result in July 2015 I began a petition to reform the organ donation system and following a few signatures, talks and support from the local media the campaign began. My local MP who raised it as an issue in Parliament and Wales introduced the Opt Out system in December 2015 and it all began to seem possible. Along the way I discovered a number of other women with similar petitions, but we still had a way to go as the protagonists in this tale before we reached our goal.  

Thankfully 9-year-old Max Johnson was our Knight in shining armour. He received a heart from 10-year-old Keira Ball who died in a car accident and wanted more people to receive the lifesaving transplants they were dying for. The Prime Minister took Max seriously and agreed to introduce the opt out system. It was to be called Max’s Law, but Max requested it be called Max & Keira’s Law to reflect his wonderful donor as well.

Finally, almost 5 years on the Opt Out system will be introduced in England this Spring!

You should always tell your loved ones your wishes, but this is especially important due to the nature of many donor’s deaths which can be sudden and unexpected so it can save them trying to work out what you would’ve wanted at an unbearable time.

Although 3,286 people have received a transplant since 1st April 2019, there are currently over 6,000 people waiting for a transplant. As you can see the sums do not add up. 6,000 people in the UK alone are currently dying to live – this is their chance at a better quality or some quality of life.  

The aim is when the Opt Out system comes in as many people as possible are aware of this change so they can make an informed decision about whether they wish to opt out. This will hopefully mean more people on the list receive their transplant before they become too sick to have one or die waiting. At the moment 3 people die a day waiting for a transplant.  

So please if you haven’t already poured out your heart today to your nearest and dearest do so now and tell them your wishes.

If you wish to become a donor before the Opt Out system is introduced please visit:
https://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/register-your-decision/register-your-details/

If you need any further information about the introduction of the Opt Out system then please visit:

https://www.organdonation.nhs.uk/helping-you-to-decide/about-organ-donation/faq/what-is-the-opt-out-system/

Alternatively, you can contact me via email: optoutcampaign@gmail.com

So why not give you heart away this Valentines? It could be the greatest decision you ever make.

Lucy xxx


by Carolyn Port 23 Apr, 2024
This month, I trained 74 residents of a street in Salisbury in CPR and using a defibrillator. Read more about the experience in my blog.
by Carolyn Port 27 Mar, 2024
Ever wondered what happens when you call 999 for an ambulance? Find out all about the process in this blog.
by Carolyn Port 21 Feb, 2024
Did you know providing first aid isn't a legal risk, but a chance to be a hero? ‍Learn how the SARAH Act protects you and why first aid training is your key to helping others.
by Carolyn Port 25 Jan, 2024
Fellow first aid trainer Jenny Legg has launched the #BraOffDefibOn campaign after alarming statistics reveal that women stand a much smaller chance of receiving CPR. Why are women not offered the same survival chances as men? Let's unpack it.
by Carolyn Port 14 Dec, 2023
There’s a good reason why certain items have become so hard to get into and send you searching for the tiniest screwdriver – it’s because the button batteries that operate them can be very dangerous.
A phone with a call waiting that shows '112 - Emergency Number' on the screen
by Carolyn Port 30 Nov, 2023
Are you aware of the various emergency numbers we have in the UK? Read our blog for all the numbers you need to know, and how to best contact them in an emergency.
by Carolyn Port 04 Jan, 2023
Changes to the age of a ‘Child’ for the purposes of CPR There has been one important first aid update since my last blog, which is that for the purposes of CPR, casualties aged from 1 to 18 are now classified as ‘children’ and the child protocol should be followed. This has changed from the previous age definition of ‘1 to puberty’ for children. What does this mean in practice? • CPR should start with 5 rescue breaths for everyone aged 0-18, followed by 30 compressions then 2 rescue breaths continuously until medical help arrives. • If you need to leave your casualty to phone for help do one minute of CPR first, before you leave them to get help (5 rescue breaths then about 3 times through the 30:2 protocol takes around a minute) Why do children have these 5 initial rescue breaths, and why give a minute’s CPR before getting help? Clinical research data shows that it is more likely to be a breathing issue that has caused a child to stop breathing, whereas it’s more likely to be a heart issue that has caused an adult to stop breathing. Rescue breaths are therefore critical to the chances of a good outcome with a child requiring CPR and for this reason were not removed from the CPR protocol even during COVID when adult breaths were temporarily removed. In addition children don’t hold onto their oxygen as well as adults therefore need the input of oxygen from you is more important. Giving 5 rescue breaths at the start of child CPR and a minute’s worth of aid before leaving them for help is therefore more likely to have a positive impact as your breaths could result in a swift improvement and possibly start them breathing again. Why has the age of a ‘child’ changed? Clinical research data has shown that up to age 18 (and actually slightly beyond) the cause of the collapse is a breathing issue, therefore the child protocol is likely to be more effective. How many hands should I use for compressions? Use as many as you need to make the compressions effective. Up to 1 year old, use 2 fingers in the centre of the chest; from age 1 upwards use one hand or two hands with fingers interlinked according to how strong you are! You’re aiming to compress down about a third of the chest wall. As a guide, most people can compress with one hand to around 10 years of age or so but if you need to use two hands, then do! What about the positioning of the defibrillator pads? Up to the age of around 8, pads should be placed in the centre of the chest and the centre of the back. Use paediatric pads if the unit has them, or switch to the paediatric setting. If there is no switch and only adult pads the unit can still be used on the child, just place the pads in the centre front / centre back positions. Over the age of 8 place the pads in the position shown on the unit / pads with the unit in adult mode (one pad just under the right shoulder on the chest, the other on the left hand side of the body about halfway down – the heart should be roughly in the centre of the gap between the pads). Follow the audible instructions as normal. What if I don’t know how old the ‘child’ is? Use your best guess – no need to find their birth certificate before deciding where to place the pads or whether to treat them as a child or adult. Remember that anything you do is better than nothing!
by Carolyn Port 11 Mar, 2022
Splinters are always a hot topic on first aid courses! Can we pull them out? Why? Why not? Who says? Qualified first aiders can pull splinters out – this is made clear by the HSE (see their MythBuster on splinters in schools at https://www.hse.gov.uk/myth/myth-busting/2014/case299-teachers-removing-childs-splinter.htm) . BUT many schools have a policy that splinters must not be removed. So who is right? A school policy stating that they will not pull out splinters over-rides the HSE position that splinters can be removed, and this is why the myth abounds that first aiders cannot pull out splinters . Why do schools have this in their policy? The most often cited reason is that we shouldn’t pull anything out of a wound in case it is ‘plugging’ a bleed, but in the case of a small splinter this is highly unlikely. Arteries are buried deep beneath the skin’s surface – far beyond the reach of a small splinter. Even though veins are nearer the surface (and can lead to significant bleeds) a splinter would not cause more than a drop of blood to be lost even if it was a very long splinter! Another reason sometimes given is that first aiders cannot ‘dig’ to remove a splinter – and the HSE agree. An embedded splinter with no part exposed to be gripped by tweezers should be left to a parent or guardian to be removed, but this doesn’t stop us removing those which have an exposed section with tweezers. So why SHOULD we pull out splinters? On the flip-side, what happens if you leave a splinter in a child’s skin until home-time? A splinter is usually from something which may well be dirty, for example from a fence, the school playground, field or on a forest school activity which could then lead to infection. In addition, it can be jolly tender if left for a period of time! But we cover it with a plaster – surely this will stop the infection? Covering a splinter with a plaster will merely encourage the infectious cells to reproduce – the infected material is already inside the wound (so a plaster won’t protect from it) and the claggy, moist environment created with a plaster is perfect for the growth and spread of infection. If the splinter has reached a capillary (blood vessel) there is now the potential for a infection through the blood – SEPSIS (you may have heard this referred to in the past as blood poisoning or septicaemia). SEPSIS kills 1,000 people in the UK EVERY WEEK! – more than the top three cancers combined. Leaving the splinter there rather than removing it and flushing the wound out is increasing the chance of sepsis – cuts and wounds are the 4th top cause of sepsis. The longer the splinter remains in the skin, the higher the risk. So, what should we do? My suggestion would be to amend the school policy to something similar to: • ‘we will remove a splinter if the child wishes us to do so, and • there is enough of the splinter exposed to enable it to be gripped by tweezers In the event that splinter is firmly embedded and cannot be gripped by tweezers or the child does not wish us to pull it out we will telephone the parent to inform them that their child has a splinter and request they attend school to remove it.’ Having a stark policy of ‘we do not remove splinters’ cuts off any permission that may be given over the telephone or actions you can take in extenuating circumstances and may be detrimental to the health of the child. What can a parent do that we can’t? The parent can break the skin to remove the splinter, or administer antiseptic cream (which a school cannot do) and cover with a plaster which will help to draw the splinter out. If the splinter is still there at the end of the school day, they could soak the affected area of skin which will help to soften it to squeeze the splinter out. If you would like more help or advice please do contact us at info@winterburytraining.co.uk. You can find out more about sepsis from Sepsis Research (www.sepsisresearch.org.uk) or the Sepsis Trust (www.sepsistrust.org).
by Carolyn Port 24 Nov, 2021
The official EYFS requirements from Ofsted remains that you must have at least one fully trained (2 day) Paediatric First Aider available to deal with first aid incidents where you have pupils of reception age (https://bit.ly/3FH14RG), and government guidance on first aid in schools states you must have first aid provision available at all times while people are on school premises and also off the premises on school trips (https://bit.ly/3rlIJWz). It is obviously good practice to have at least 3-4 full Paediatric trained colleagues to provide flexibility for illness, absence, training courses, PPA cover etc. The fully trained paediatric staff can then be further supported by ‘sufficient and adequate’ additional first aiders in the school (the number to be determined by the school according to their first aid needs assessment). In practice these are usually staff who have completed a one-day Emergency Paediatric First Aid course. Secondary schools will have additional hazards in their curriculum and environment, such as science labs, sporting activities with more risk of serious injury, hazardous equipment in art and/or DT and heavier pieces of equipment. In addition, communities tend to be much larger, with high numbers of pupils and staff, which also bring a higher risk of an incident occuring. Health and safety legislation additionally places a duty upon employers to have first aid provision available for everyone in the school, including the headteacher, teachers, non-teaching staff, children, visitors and contractors, therefore some form of first aid training for adults is a requirement. This can be achieved by some colleagues holding the one-day Emergency First Aid at Work qualification (which can be done concurrently with the one day paediatric qualification above). However, there is an increasing move amongst schools to ensure they have at least one member of staff with the full 3 day First Day at Work qualification, and this is being reflected in the messaging in health and safety conferences and meetings, and in the guidance being provided by local authorities and within Academy Trusts. In particular, the additional day covers heart attacks, strokes, angina, crush injuries, chest and abdominal injuries and deeper training on areas such as bleeding. It is completely feasible that some of these may occur within a school setting to school staff and volunteers, and the governors / trusts are responsible for ensuring forseeable first aid incidents can be adequately dealt with by trained members of staff. 3 days out of the workplace is a commitment, but it is possible to combine this 3 day course with the full Paediatric qualification and obtain both in the same timeframe. You could therefore send a staff member who is due to renew their Paediatric qualification anyway, or train a colleague who can then offer further flexibility in the Paediatric first aid requirement. All of the qualifications mentioned last for 3 years and annual refreshers can be accessed. For further guidance on these requirements in your particular school please do not hesitate to get in touch - we can help with a needs assessment which is specific to your circumstances and ensure you have adequate cover to meet your obligations. Carolyn Port, Director, Winterbury Training info@winterburytraining.co.uk 07584 732119
by Carolyn Port 19 Sept, 2021
People who have received one or both vaccinations are reporting different symptoms than the high temperature, cough and loss of taste/smell which originally characterised the virus. The top 4 symptoms in these groups are now: Headache Sore throat Runny nose Sneezing Sneezing is much more likely to be reported as a symptom in people who are vaccinated versus those who are unvaccinated. Persistent cough is now at number 5 for those who are single jabbed, and at number 8 in those double jabbed, and a high temperature is at number 12 yet still in the top 5 for people who are unvaccinated. These figures are according to the UK-wide Zoe COVID study with around a million people reporting their symptoms daily to build knowledge of how the virus symptoms are changing (https://covid.joinzoe.com/post/new-top-5-covid-symptoms). CORONAVIRUS IN CHILDREN Early September data showed around 18,000 cases in 0-18s daily, with a huge surge in Scotland where schools returned in mid-August. (https://covid.joinzoe.com/). Symptoms reported via the Zoe study are variable, sometimes dependent upon age, and children are more likely to be asymptomatic. Top symptoms reported include headache and fever , then traditional flu-like symptoms such as a runny nose, sore throat, coughs etc. Tummy pain and digestive upsets are also more likely. IMPLICATIONS FOR EARLY YEARS SETTINGS Studies on childhood COVID are less wide-reaching than adult studies, but it seems that children could exhibit either the early traditional symptoms or have the more common sneezing and headache symptoms. This makes things tricky in your setting, because we all know these symptoms could belong to any number of autumn and winter viruses as well as Coronavirus! Our advice would be that in younger preschool children and babies you ask parents to regularly (at least twice weekly) test using LFT devices (available free from https://www.gov.uk/order-coronavirus-rapid-lateral-flow-tests) and if they show a positive result, obtain a PCR test and keep children at home if they exhibit any symptoms at all, also taking them for a full PCR test. In older children home LFT tests can be carried out twice weekly as a precaution if they have no symptoms, but they should be taken for a full PCR if symptoms develop.
More posts
Share by: